Thursday, March 03, 2005

The Ultimate Theory of Everything

In our modern world of science and technology, there's a lot of theories. Some of these theories have been proven in mathematics and experiments, like the now famous theory or relativity. But there are others, which seem possible, but are impossible to prove, for now that is.

One such theory is the focus of today's article. Its called the Superstring Theory. This theory is, so far, the best candidate for the Theory of Everything, a theory that sets out to explain everything and every phenomenon in nature. The problem with the theory is that its based on the idea that there are "strings" that are much smaller than atoms, which would mean that they couldn't be observed in any lab experiment. However, scientists believe that we may be able to see the effects of such "strings" by observing our universe.

Well, such a theory has its debunkers and skeptics, as do all great theories. But if scientists can find more evidence for it, we may have taken a great leap forward in understanding nature.

Could two lookalike galaxies, barely a whisker apart in the night sky, herald a revolution in our understanding of fundamental physics? Some physicists believe that the two galaxies are the same - its image has been split into two, they maintain, by a "cosmic string"; a San Andreas Fault in the very fabric of space and time.

If this interpretation is correct, then CSL-1 - the name of the curious double galaxy - is the first concrete evidence for "superstring theory": the best candidate for a "theory of everything", which attempts to encapsulate all the phenomena of nature in one neat set of equations.

Superstring theory views the fundamental building blocks of all matter - the electrons and quarks that make up the atoms in our bodies - as ultra- tiny pieces of vibrating "string". And, just as different vibrations of a violin string correspond to different musical notes, different vibrations of this fundamental string correspond to different fundamental particles.


Click here for the full article.

1 Comments:

Blogger CS said...

Yah, I agree that this article was a little technical. But I guess an explaination for a "Theory for Everything" can't be that simple...

I too believe that there are more dimensions than we presently can touch or experience. Unfortunately, science is based on evidence and not faith, so its going to be hard to prove such things exist when its virtually impossible to find evidence.

8:54 AM, March 04, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home